Archive for category News Release

Justice Court Pretrial Services to Reduce Hours of Operation at Jail

LAS VEGAS – Starting March 1, 2010, the Las Vegas Township Justice Court’s Pretrial Services Division will be closed between the hours of midnight to 8 a.m. at the Clark County Detention Center. The closure will affect individuals and bail bonding companies who wish to post bail with the Justice Court during the overnight hours.

The closure is a cost-containment decision to allow staff to work more efficiently during the time when the majority of bail has been posted, which historically has been after 8 a.m. in the morning.

Information on inmates incarcerated at the Clark County Detention Center can be accessed 24-hours a day, seven days a week, at the following internet link: http://redrock.co.clark.nv.us/ccdcincustory/inCustodySearch.aspx

###

No Comments

Mandatory E-Filing Improves Efficiency for Court Clerk’s Office

CHALLENGES IN FIRST TWO WEEKS ALSO DELIVER BENEFITS

AT A GLANCE

  • Mandatory Electronic Filing has saved the court 125,670 pages of paper in its first two weeks.
  • Those pages would have filled 63 banker boxes with paper. In the past, those boxes would have been stored in a file room.
  • A total of 6,798 transactions have been processed “no charge” in the Clerk’s Office.

LAS VEGAS – The equivalent of 63 boxes of civil complaints, Family Court documents and miscellaneous filings have been delivered to the Eighth Judicial District Court in the first two weeks of mandatory electronic filing all with the push of a button. In the past, all 125,670 pages of documents would have been hand-stamped, scanned and then filed in boxes for storage. Today, all of these pages are being delivered electronically to the court’s computer system.

“The Court consistently has demonstrated its commitment to efficiencies and long-term cost containment,” said Chief Judge T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr. “This is a massive change in the way we do business and it will revolutionize our courts.”

From February 1 through February 12, 2010, the District Court processed 24,548 civil and family transactions using the court’s e-filing vendor WizNet.  A  small number,  3,602  transactions, were rejected by the  court  for  various  reasons,  including  a lack of signature or missing documents.  A total of 20,946 transactions were accepted for adjudication in the District Court.

The process has required adaption by litigants and the Court Clerk’s Office.  The large number of accepted transactions indicates attorneys and law firms are doing a good job of submitting documents correctly to the court, said Civil Presiding Judge Elizabeth Gonzalez.

“We appreciate the willingness of the law firms and attorneys to learn this new system and use it,” said Judge Gonzalez. “Everyone’s patience is appreciated as we continue to strengthen the system and improve our customer service.”

The Court Clerk’s Office has faced a number of challenges in the first two-weeks of e-filing:

  • The court has received approximately 3,000 civil filings and 2,500 family filings each day, which is much more than anticipated prior to mandatory e-filing.
  • The vast number of filings has slowed the court’s ability to accept and process documents. The wait times are now down to 24 hours for civil case types. It is still taking about a week to process Family and Probate court documents.
  • Documents have been rejected because of incorrect case numbers, missing signatures and incorrect document titles. For instance, document titles must be submitted in Title Case Only to be accepted by the system.  Double-checking documents first will ensure transactions will be accepted by the court the first time.

The court has processed roughly 70-percent of its documents through WizNet, while roughly 30-percent have been filed in the self-service kiosks at the Court Clerk counters.

“We processed more pro bono, in-kind service and no-charge documents at our Clerk’s counters than most courts process in an entire week,” said Court Executive Officer and Clerk of the Court Steven D. Grierson. “Those documents, totaling 6,798, make up a small percentage of the total 24,548 electronic filings submitted from law offices. We have been very busy accepting new filings, correcting problems and making sure our systems are working as effectively as possible.”

Tips for making the system work better include filing early, including electronic signatures or signed documents and ensuring documents include the correct case numbers. Users are encouraged to call for assistance with the court’s e-filing system: (702) 671-0514 (Civil) or (702) 455-5941 or 455-2357 (Family).

###

7 Comments

Adult Drug Court To Benefit From Residential Treatment Grant

Local Non-Profits to Partner with Court to Expand Treatment Options

LAS VEGAS – The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has awarded the Eighth Judicial District Court an $885,960 grant to expand residential treatment options for participants in the Adult Drug Court.  The money will improve efforts to retain participants in the Adult Drug Court program, reduce recidivism, and reduce overcrowding in the local jail.  The District Court will use the three-year grant to partner with local non-profit organizations to place more individuals into residential or day treatment services.

“Southern Nevada is in desperate need of funding for residential substance abuse and mental health treatment beds.  This grant will provide a much needed resource to our community for those people who are extremely addicted to illegal drugs and prescription drugs,” said Judge Jackie Glass. “The court can now assist more individuals that require an intensive treatment program in order to break their cycle of drug addiction.”

The three-year grant will provide $295,320 a year to extend appropriate treatment options to participants when residential treatment beds are fully occupied, protect the community by addressing drug addition and reduce the number of drug offenders sitting in the jail seeking treatment.

SAMHSA is a public health agency within the Department of Health and Human Services responsible for improving substance abuse prevention.  Considered as a model court, the District Court’s Adult Drug Court was established in 1992 to provide supervision and treatment for individuals addicted to drugs.  When the Adult Drug Court was created, only four Drug Courts operated across the nation.

###

No Comments

Final Warning: Traffic Amnesty Ends Friday (Feb. 6)

The Las Vegas Township Justice Court officially ends Traffic Amnesty this Friday (Feb. 6). The next day, February 7, 2009, the Justice Court will begin issuing warrants for individuals who have failed to pay outstanding traffic tickets and will actively pursue collection for any outstanding obligation by turning over past due tickets to a collection agency.

To take advantage of amnesty before the deadline individuals must call (702) 671-3444 or visit http://www.clarkcountycourts.us/paythefine.

Since announcing the end of Traffic Amnesty in November 2008, the Las Vegas Township Justice Court has collected more than $3.5 million in unpaid tickets and closed nearly 5,000 outstanding cases.

No Comments

Las Vegas Justice Court Reminds Offenders Time Is Running Out

“PAY THE TICKET, AVOID THE CLICK-IT” CAMPAIGN NEARS END ON FEBRUARY 6, 2009

The Las Vegas Township Justice Court’s Traffic Amnesty program “Pay the Ticket, Avoid the Click-it” ends on February 6, 2009, meaning individuals with outstanding traffic tickets only have a few more weeks to clear those up before the court issues arrest warrants and adds on new penalties.  “There are nearly 140,000 people who have chosen to ignore our amnesty and time is running out,” said Chief Judge Ann Zimmerman.

Traffic Amnesty has allowed the court to close more than 3,000 cases and collect nearly $2 million since the campaign began on November 17, 2008.  The program has succeeded beyond the court’s expectations, according to Zimmerman.  Money collected enhances the Clark County General Fund, the State of Nevada General Fund, and returns revenues to taxpayers.

The court will continue to provide amnesty through February 6, 2009.  After that date, the court will enforce arrest warrants for any unpaid tickets and will actively pursue collection for any outstanding obligation.

“People with outstanding fines could find themselves in jail with additional fines and penalties,” said Zimmerman.  She adds, “We have seen hundreds of people arrange payment plans, clear up their fines or pay their obligations entirely.”

Roughly 220,000 traffic tickets are processed by the Las Vegas Justice Court each year.  Customers can still take advantage of Traffic Amnesty by dialing (702) 671-3444 or visiting www.clarkcountycourts.us/paythefine or www.clarkcountycourts.us/pagarlamulta.

No Comments

Pay The Ticket, Avoid The Click-It Campaign Starts Strong

Top Ten Offenders Fail To Contact The Court

The Las Vegas Township Justice Court’s Pay the Ticket, Avoid the Click-it Campaign has improved the number of people paying past due traffic tickets by 15 percent since the campaign began November 17, 2008.

The campaign encourages individuals with past due traffic citations to come in and clear them up before the court starts issuing warrants in February 2009.

“The results have been phenomenal and we’re just getting started,” said Chief Judge Doug E. Smith. “We’re looking forward to helping more individuals clear up their tickets and avoid a warrant in the coming months.”

Individuals with outstanding tickets can call (702) 671-3444 or go to www.clarkcountycourts.us/paythefine. ¿Habla Espanol? www.clarkcountycourts.us/pagarlamulta

This week, more than 190,000 postcards will be sent to individuals with outstanding tickets in the court.

“These outstanding fines represent obligations owed to the taxpayers of Clark County and so we are doing everything we can to alert individuals to their outstanding obligations and giving them a chance to take care of them before arrest,” said Edward A. Friedland, Court Executive Officer.

More than 190,000 individuals owe obligations to the Las Vegas Justice Court, including a list of the 10 Most Wanted Individuals with the largest number of outstanding fines with the court.

“So far none of the individuals on the 10 Most Wanted List has come in to take advantage of this program,” said Smith. “We want to help these individuals avoid further fines and possible arrest. They just need to call or come into the court, otherwise, we’ll issue arrest warrants in February.”

The Ten Most Wanted Individuals with Outstanding Traffic Fines in the Las Vegas Township Justice Court are:

Name City Amount Owed
David Drum Las Vegas $20,057
Marco Manzy Las Vegas $18,164
Brandon Peachey Las Vegas $17,195
Mario Ramirez-Gomez Las Vegas $14,754
Lance Lauara Las Vegas $14,502
Jose Garcia Las Vegas $13,977
Lamont Pitts Las Vegas $13,028
Anthony Reed Las Vegas $12,390
Deshawn Byrd Las Vegas $10,938
Alan Berroteran Las Vegas $10,636

No Comments

Courts and Clark County Commission Reveal Statewide Judicial Business Plan

The Clark County Commission and the state courts believe they have found a partial solution to the perpetual problems of funding new judges and providing faster access to the justice system for civil litigants.

Nevada Supreme Court Justice James Hardesty said a “judicial business plan” will be proposed to the Nevada Legislature in 2009 to fund badly needed judgeships in Clark County.  In essence, new civil judges would be funded primarily by those who use their services instead of raising taxes.

“We analyzed civil filing fees of the states in the Western Region and found that we were at the bottom in most civil case types,” said Justice Hardesty.  Historically, base civil filing fees were last raised in 1993 and have never been raised for the purpose of funding courts.

“As revenues fail to keep pace with growth, it is incumbent upon all of us to find ways to maintain the services our community needs,” said Clark County Commission Chairman Rory Reid.  “This plan helps our courts meet the increasing demand on our justice system without raising taxes.”

Filings in civil cases have been increasing at a considerably higher rate than in criminal cases.   In fiscal year 2008, more than 34,000 civil cases were filed in Nevada; more than 27,000 of those were filed in Clark County.

In Clark County, most civil cases take three years and six months to reach a jury trial.  With the new judges, the courts are expected to catch up with growth and let most cases be resolved in less than two years.

Justice Hardesty thanked Clark County Commission Chairman Rory Reid for his leadership in “facilitating improvement to the courts.”

The Judicial Business Plan includes the recommendation of a Legislative Interim Study Committee on Chancery Courts to expand the Business Courts.  The plan would expedite access to the courts for the resolution of business lawsuits that can hamper business operations or even prompt bankruptcies and closures.  Access to Business Courts in other states has prompted businesses to relocate there.

“Nevada’s Business Courts have been very successful in resolving business disputes expeditiously, but the workloads of those courts have increased to the point where additional judges are necessary to keep pace,” said Art Ritchie, Chief Judge-elect of the Eighth Judicial District Court.  Clark County currently has two district judges assigned as Business Court judges.

Under the proposed plan, the fee increases would provide a fund that would offset the costs of new judgeships and facilities.  The Nevada Constitution specifies that the state pays for a judge’s salary and benefits, but the counties are responsible for providing court facilities, support staff and equipment.

State Bar of Nevada President Bruce Beesley said some lawyers may express “some initial unhappiness with the increases, but in a short period of time they will appreciate the addition of new judges.”

“There is a critical need for new judges in Clark County,” Mr. Beesley said.  “It is an unfortunate fact of life that everything costs more and more and as we grow we need more judges.”

New judges would be added in Clark County, but the total has not yet been determined.  That issue must be addressed by the Legislature at its 2009 session.  Increasing filing fees and adding new judges requires legislative action.  “The legislature has been consistently clear to me that agreements between the courts and the counties are critical to legislative approval,” said Judge Ritchie.

While Clark County will benefit from the fee increases for more judges, they will also apply statewide.  Washoe County could use their funds for an additional judge or for facilities needs.  Some judicial districts can utilize the funds for capital improvements rather than an increase in judicial positions at this time.

No Comments

Chief Judge Kathy A. Hardcastle Assigns Three Judges to Resolve Election Disputes on Nov. 4

Three Clark County District Court judges have been named to hear any election-related legal questions on November 4, 2008, Election Day. Chief Judge Kathy A. Hardcastle has named Judges Douglas W. Herndon, David B. Barker and Valerie Adair to provide the necessary judicial review of any potential election concerns that are raised.

The assignment of these judges will allow litigants to seek immediate relief at a moment’s notice and assist the court in streamlining the process of addressing election concerns, according to Hardcastle.

“In an interest of fairness, it is important that we have judges available to provide immediate relief as questions arise,” said Chief Judge Hardcastle. “When an issue related to the election comes up, we want to be able to address it quickly and provide interested parties with timely access to the judicial system.”

Judges Herndon, Barker and Adair are not in contested races this election and it is unlikely they would be named as parties in an election-related action.

No Comments

Las Vegas Justice Court Doubles Efforts to Sideline DUI Offenders

Second DUI Court Seeks To Increase Public Safety By Breaking Cycle of Addiction

A second DUI Court has been added in the Las Vegas Justice Court Township with funding from a grant provided by the State of Nevada’s Office of Traffic Safety. The court, presided over by Judge Nancy Oesterle, joins the other specialty court started in 2003 by Judge Tony Abbatangelo.

The second court was necessary as more offenders have entered the program. There are currently 180 individuals participating in both DUI Courts. Designed as a court-supervised, comprehensive treatment program, the DUI Specialty Court is designed to help first and second DUI offenders obtain treatment for misdemeanor DUI offenses.

Across the state, driving impaired arrests have increased to 18,235, or one arrest for every 94 drivers, according to Chuck Abbott, Director of Nevada’s Office of Traffic Safety. “For some time, we have recognized that improving law enforcement is only the first step in reducing/eliminating the problem of impaired drivers on Nevada’s roadways,” said Abbott. “The fact is DUI courts have proven to be an extremely effective way of solving the cause of the problem.”

The Las Vegas Township Justice Court plans to expand the DUI Courts to approximately 300 participants with the addition of the second court.

“The Justice Court DUI program provides intensive substance abuse treatment,” said Program Coordinator, Ray Figueroa. “We use a therapeutic court model, which means we monitor participants through House Arrest, breath testing, drug testing, Breath Ignition Interlock Device, and compliance rewards for meeting treatment goals in a timely fashion.”

Judge Oesterle volunteered to preside over the DUI Specialty Court because the program has proven to be effective. “The Court serves an important purpose instead of merely warehousing the “hard-core” alcoholics in jail and then releasing them from custody to re-offend again, we are offering them the hope of a clean and sober lifestyle. The recidivism rate is very low,” stated Oesterle.

The participants are required to pay for the expense of their own treatment plan, which is approximately $4,500. The program is cost effective for the taxpayers who would otherwise be paying for the incarceration bill. “I believe it is a win/win situation. The program represents a substantial commitment on behalf of everyone involved, including the Judge. However, we do it because we are committed to saving lives; those of the participants and innocent members of our community,” said Oesterle.

Not everyone qualifies for the Court. A team of individuals screen offenders to determine if they meet the criteria to qualify for the program. The DUI Court Judge, attorneys, treatment providers, representatives from Clark County’s House Arrest unit, and representatives from Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM), along with the program coordinator, Ray Figueroa, meet prior to court to review each participant’s progress before the court appearance.

“Normally, when a defendant is sentenced by a Judge to the DUI Court, there is a six-month suspended jail sentence imposed to ensure compliance within the program,” said Figueroa. This underlying jail sentence provides an incentive to finish the program and to obtain the necessary treatment to avoid further problems with drinking and driving.

As long as the individual remains compliant with all of the Court’s orders, they will not be required to serve any portion of their suspended sentence. All DUI offenders in the program are placed on House Arrest for the first 90 days of their involvement to assist in their transition into the therapeutic process. The House Arrest ankle bracelets have Global Positioning System (GPS) monitoring and a House Arrest Officer is assigned to supervise the individual during that time frame. Random drug testing and in-home breath testing units monitor individual abstinence from alcohol and give participants an opportunity to demonstrate their willingness to comply with the Judge’s orders.

Judge Oesterle begins each DUI Specialty Court hearing with “A thought of the day” which is provided in open court, before all of the participants, by one of the members in the DUI Court program. “It’s always from the heart as each person describes how the treatment program has helped them live a clean and sober life,” said Judge Oesterle. “Many times, the participants are very emotional and thankful for being allowed into a program that really improves their lives. It motivates the audience to continue with their own treatment program for the opportunity to address their own chronic alcohol problem,” said Oesterle.

DUI Court Judges utilize token compliance gifts to reward and motivate participants to complete the program, which usually takes a year to complete. Additionally, participants doing well in treatment require less court appearances as they complete each phase of treatment. However, if a participant refuses to comply or has a relapse, the Judge can impose sanctions such as ordering the offender to return to House Arrest, writing an essay, community service, or requiring additional daily AA meetings. In a small number of cases, the Judge will terminate the individual from the program and impose the suspended jail sentence. Terminations account for roughly 20 percent of the individuals accepted into the program since it started five years ago.

The program’s length is determined by the progress made by the individual participants. Once the requirements are met, individuals meet with the presiding Judge and their treatment team to review their progress and schedule a graduation date. A formal graduation ceremony is held during open court to demonstrate to other participants that the program can result in success and it also rewards the individual for successfully completing the program.

“Graduation day is an inspiring day for the individual and to those around them that have worked just as hard to help them finish the program,” said Figueroa.

No Comments

Yamashita Named Probate Commissioner

Clark County’s Eighth Judicial District Court has hired Wesley Yamashita to serve as Probate Commissioner. Yamashita replaces Thomas Biggar who retired in August.

Recently a partner with the law firm of Greene, Roberts, and Rasmussen, PLLC., Yamashita is a licensed attorney for the State of Nevada and was licensed in the State of Utah. He previously worked as an Alternate Hearing Master in the District Court.

Yamashita has been practicing primarily probate law in the State of Nevada for more than 20 years and was the top candidate out of an outstanding pool of applicants. He has the requisite skills and his knowledge of probate law will allow him to contribute immediately to the administration of probate matters with minimal transition time, according to Chief Judge Kathy A. Hardcastle.

No Comments